首页> 外文OA文献 >Undergraduate Program Review Processes: A Case Study in Opportunity for Academic Libraries
【2h】

Undergraduate Program Review Processes: A Case Study in Opportunity for Academic Libraries

机译:本科课程审查过程:以大学图书馆为例的案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

How can an academic library most effectively participate and expand its contributions to program reviews at the institutional level? By becoming involved in undergraduate reviews, college and university libraries can articulate new and enhanced roles for themselves on campus. Academic libraries have always contributed to a variety of institutional review processes. However, by embracing a more holistic view of its support, the library can expand beyond collection-related metrics to encompass all the ways the library interconnects with the program. Furthermore, by becoming proactively involved with the committee(s) responsible for managing institutional program reviews, libraries can contribute to the governance of this essential activity on campus. This paper describes one academic library\u27s experience and efforts in becoming involved with undergraduate reviews at both the program and institutional levels. It is hoped that sharing our case study and the tools we have created, will benefit other academic libraries.
机译:高校图书馆如何最有效地参与和扩大其对机构级课程审查的贡献?通过参与大学评论,高校图书馆可以在校园中表达自己的新角色和增强角色。高校图书馆一直为各种机构审查过程做出了贡献。但是,通过包含对其支持的更全面的了解,该库可以扩展到与集合相关的指标以外的范围,从而涵盖该库与程序互连的所有方式。此外,通过积极参与负责管理机构计划审查的委员会,图书馆可以为校园这一重要活动的治理做出贡献。本文介绍了一个大学图书馆在计划和机构层面参与本科评论的经验和努力。希望共享我们的案例研究和我们创建的工具,将使其他学术图书馆受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号